Saudi Arabia: Religious leaders condemned by Reporters without Borders for fatwas declared against journalists
"These fatwas constitute calls for murder that endanger the lives of journalists who are already working in conditions made more difficult by the delicate political context in which they have to operate. We urge religious officials to show moderation so that no irreparable steps are taken. The highest Islamic authorities should publicly condemn such fatwas", it added.
The religious dignitary in the Saudi case played down his comments a few days later, in the face of an outcry prompted by his statements, but still without backing down on the validity of his edict.
"It is lawful to kill (...) the advocates of depravity (...) if their evil is not removed by simple sanctions. The situation is very serious (...), moral depravity being a form of perversion on earth", Sheikh Saleh al-Luhidan said on a local Saudi radio. He was replying to a question from a listener about "immoral" programmes (variety and entertainment programmes) broadcast on satellite television during the month of Ramadan.
Fatwas against journalists have become increasingly common in recent years. Two journalists were targeted by fatwas in 2003 after they condemned the backward nature of Islam practised in Afghanistan. An Iranian ayatollah called for two Azerbaijani journalists to be killed in December 2006 after they wrote an article about the superiority of European values. More recently, a Pakistani religious leader declared a fatwa in June 2007 against the editorial staff of fashion magazine Octane, based on a series of photos headlined "Adam and Eve, the apple of discord".
On the other hand, a fatwa issued by the Popular Resistance Committees, one of the highest religious authorities in the Palestinian territories, brought forward the release in 2007 of British journalist Alan Johnston, who was held hostage in the Gaza Strip.
16 September 2008
Source: Reporters without Borders